[release-4.22] OCPBUGS-101857: Replace golang.org/x/net with github.com/openshift-sustaining/net@v0.50.0-sec.3 to address CVE-2026-33814 by nindsimonv · Pull Request #43 · openshift/openstack-resource-controller

nindsimonv · 2026-08-31T22:50:28Z

Replaces golang.org/x/net with github.com/openshift-sustaining/net@v0.50.0-sec.3 to fix CVE-2026-33814 (Go HTTP/2 DoS via malformed SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE).

…om/openshift-sustaining/net@v0.50.0-sec.3 to address CVE-2026-33814

openshift-merge-bot · 2026-08-31T22:50:30Z

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-08-31T22:50:34Z

@nindsimonv: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101857, which is invalid:

expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101857 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 5.0.0 and in one of the following states: MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Replaces golang.org/x/net with github.com/openshift-sustaining/net@v0.50.0-sec.3 to fix CVE-2026-33814 (Go HTTP/2 DoS via malformed SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

rissh · 2026-09-07T12:50:54Z

/retest

redhat-chai-bot · 2026-09-07T15:29:02Z

/retest

Re-running to clear the e2e-hypershift failure, which is unrelated to this change (a vendored golang.org/x/net CVE bump). The failure is a pre-existing e2e test bug — TestCreateCluster/Main/EnsureAppLabel expects the openstack-cloud-controller-manager pod to carry an app label — plus a teardown dump race; neither is affected by a dependency vendoring change, and all other jobs (images, test, lint, verify, verify-deps, security, e2e-openstack-capi-techpreview) pass.

AI-generated. Review for accuracy.

nindsimonv · 2026-09-08T20:34:07Z

/jira refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-09-08T20:34:14Z

@nindsimonv: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101857, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target version (4.22.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.22.0)
bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
release note text is set and does not match the template
dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-104242 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-104242 targets the "5.0.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 5.0.0
bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (ocp-sustaining-admins@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

nindsimonv · 2026-09-08T21:05:15Z

/test e2e-hypershift

rissh · 2026-09-09T05:08:37Z

/retest

nindsimonv · 2026-09-09T23:18:08Z

Hi @gryf @stephenfin wondering if you could add an override for ci/prow/e2e-hypershift test
See below our findings.

The e2e-hypershift failure is unrelated to this PR (a vendored golang.org/x/net CVE bump for CVE-2026-33814).

CI-log analysis of run 2097552747103522816 shows no x/net/go.mod/vendor/compile errors; the tree built and 145 tests ran.

The failures are pre-existing/environmental:

TestCreateCluster/Main/EnsureAppLabel: OpenStack CCM pod missing the app label (persistent deploy-config/provider gap; fails every run, job is ~0% on release-4.22).
TestNodePool/.../OpenStackAdvancedTest: 45m NodePool provisioning timeout (intermittent infra).

cc @rissh

stephenfin · 2026-09-10T16:24:33Z

Hi @gryf @stephenfin wondering if you could add an override for ci/prow/e2e-hypershift test See below our findings.

The e2e-hypershift failure is unrelated to this PR (a vendored golang.org/x/net CVE bump for CVE-2026-33814).

CI-log analysis of run 2097552747103522816 shows no x/net/go.mod/vendor/compile errors; the tree built and 145 tests ran.

The failures are pre-existing/environmental:
* TestCreateCluster/Main/EnsureAppLabel: OpenStack CCM pod missing the `app` label (persistent deploy-config/provider gap; fails every run, job is ~0% on release-4.22).

* TestNodePool/.../OpenStackAdvancedTest: 45m NodePool provisioning timeout (intermittent infra).
cc @rissh

Thanks for looking into this. This job should not be running here. Hypershift on OpenStack is currently tech preview and was broken from ~4.20 until 4.23. The job should have been dropped in openshift/release#80481 or openshift/release#81208. I'll submit a new follow-up to openshift/release shortly.

/override ci/prow/e2e-hypershift

Otherwise, these changes look good.

/lgtm
/approve

openshift-ci · 2026-09-10T16:26:10Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: stephenfin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [stephenfin]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci · 2026-09-10T16:26:14Z

@stephenfin: Overrode contexts on behalf of stephenfin: ci/prow/e2e-hypershift

Details

In response to this:

Hi @gryf @stephenfin wondering if you could add an override for ci/prow/e2e-hypershift test See below our findings.

The e2e-hypershift failure is unrelated to this PR (a vendored golang.org/x/net CVE bump for CVE-2026-33814).

CI-log analysis of run 2097552747103522816 shows no x/net/go.mod/vendor/compile errors; the tree built and 145 tests ran.

The failures are pre-existing/environmental:
* TestCreateCluster/Main/EnsureAppLabel: OpenStack CCM pod missing the `app` label (persistent deploy-config/provider gap; fails every run, job is ~0% on release-4.22).

* TestNodePool/.../OpenStackAdvancedTest: 45m NodePool provisioning timeout (intermittent infra).
cc @rissh
Thanks for looking into this. This job should not be running here. Hypershift on OpenStack is currently tech preview and was broken from ~4.20 until 4.23. The job should have been dropped in openshift/release#80481 or openshift/release#81208. I'll submit a new follow-up to openshift/release shortly.

/override ci/prow/e2e-hypershift

Otherwise, these changes look good.

/lgtm
/approve

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

openshift-ci · 2026-09-10T16:26:17Z

@nindsimonv: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

mandre · 2026-09-11T10:30:38Z

We'll need openshift/release#84979 in order to merge this change (same for the other backports)

mandre

/lgtm

mandre · 2026-09-11T14:33:46Z

/retest-required

mandre · 2026-09-11T14:58:17Z

/verified by e2e-openstack-capi-techpreview

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-09-11T14:58:29Z

@mandre: This PR has been marked as verified by e2e-openstack-capi-techpreview.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by e2e-openstack-capi-techpreview

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-09-11T15:03:59Z

@nindsimonv: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101857
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-101857 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Replaces golang.org/x/net with github.com/openshift-sustaining/net@v0.50.0-sec.3 to fix CVE-2026-33814 (Go HTTP/2 DoS via malformed SETTINGS_MAX_FRAME_SIZE).

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[release-4.22] OCPBUGS-101857: Replace golang.org/x/net with github.c…

685028d

…om/openshift-sustaining/net@v0.50.0-sec.3 to address CVE-2026-33814

openshift-ci Bot requested review from gryf and stephenfin August 31, 2026 22:50

openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 8, 2026

openshift-ci Bot assigned stephenfin Sep 10, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 10, 2026

openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 10, 2026

mandre reviewed Sep 11, 2026

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci Bot assigned mandre Sep 11, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Sep 11, 2026

openshift-ci Bot merged commit b9a621e into openshift:release-4.22 Sep 11, 2026
10 checks passed

Uh oh!

Conversation

nindsimonv commented Aug 31, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-merge-bot Bot commented Aug 31, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 31, 2026

Uh oh!

rissh commented Sep 7, 2026

Uh oh!

redhat-chai-bot commented Sep 7, 2026

Uh oh!

nindsimonv commented Sep 8, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 8, 2026

Uh oh!

nindsimonv commented Sep 8, 2026

Uh oh!

rissh commented Sep 9, 2026

Uh oh!

nindsimonv commented Sep 9, 2026

Uh oh!

stephenfin commented Sep 10, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci Bot commented Sep 10, 2026

Uh oh!

mandre commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

mandre commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

mandre commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 11, 2026

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants